↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed mobilisation for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed mobilisation for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008346.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenxing Ma, Qiuxiao Wang, Ming Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 30%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,237,831
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,716
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,649
of 274,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.