↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed mobilisation for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed mobilisation for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008346.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenxing Ma, Qiuxiao Wang, Ming Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 26%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 18%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 37 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,078,608
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,662
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,817
of 195,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.