↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Therapies for depression in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Therapies for depression in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003465
Authors

Shabnam Ghazi-Noori, Tin Hei Chung, Katherine Deane, Hugh E Rickards, Carl E Clarke

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 37%
Psychology 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 50 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,387,843
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,067
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,998
of 50,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.