↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006555.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian KL Choi, Jos H Verbeek, Wilson Wai-San Tam, Johnny Y Jiang

Abstract

Back pain is a common disorder that has a tendency to recur. It is unclear if exercises, either as part of treatment or as a post-treatment programme, can reduce back pain recurrences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 19%
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Sports and Recreations 13 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 48 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,282,923
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,308
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,400
of 129,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.