The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Surgical repair of spontaneous perineal tears that occur during childbirth versus no intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008534.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzan MA Elharmeel, Yasmin Chaudhary, Stephanie Tan, Elly Scheermeyer, Ashraf Hanafy, Mieke L van Driel |
| Abstract |
Perineal tears commonly occur during childbirth. They are sutured most of the time. Surgical repair can be associated with adverse outcomes, such as pain, discomfort and interference with normal activities during puerperium and possibly breastfeeding. Surgical repair also has an impact on clinical workload and human and financial resources. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 15% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,638,157
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,186
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,103
of 131,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.