↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Chris Burtin, Vittoria R Formico, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Martijn A. Spruit, Kylie Hill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 500 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 16%
Student > Bachelor 66 13%
Researcher 34 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 7%
Other 27 5%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 185 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 86 17%
Sports and Recreations 34 7%
Psychology 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 204 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#789,331
of 22,203,123 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,712
of 12,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,146
of 288,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,203,123 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.