↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
677 Mendeley
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Chris Burtin, Vittoria R Formico, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Martijn A. Spruit, Kylie Hill

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 677 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 676 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 13%
Student > Bachelor 74 11%
Researcher 43 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 6%
Other 31 5%
Other 110 16%
Unknown 292 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 14%
Sports and Recreations 34 5%
Unspecified 26 4%
Psychology 19 3%
Other 73 11%
Unknown 313 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#694,220
of 26,495,046 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,201
of 13,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,370
of 370,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,495,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.