↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Chris Burtin, Vittoria R Formico, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Martijn A. Spruit, Kylie Hill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 20%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 18%
Sports and Recreations 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 86 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#687,134
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,735
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,105
of 272,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.