↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
611 Mendeley
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Chris Burtin, Vittoria R Formico, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Martijn A. Spruit, Kylie Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 610 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 14%
Student > Bachelor 71 12%
Researcher 40 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 6%
Other 30 5%
Other 82 13%
Unknown 269 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 15%
Sports and Recreations 34 6%
Psychology 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 289 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#676,556
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,260
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,592
of 367,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.