↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different strategies for using topical corticosteroids in people with eczema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Different strategies for using topical corticosteroids in people with eczema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013356
Authors

Joanne R Chalmers, Emma Axon, Jane Harvey, Miriam Santer, Matthew J Ridd, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad Langan, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Ingrid Muller, Chiau Ming Long, Saumya Panda, Pavel Chernyshov, Ben Carter, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,427,977
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,971
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,467
of 367,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.