↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Assistive technology for rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Assistive technology for rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006729.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Tuntland, Ingvild Kjeken, Lena V. Nordheim, Louise Falzon, Gro Jamtvedt, Kåre Birger Hagen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 48 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,932,629
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,414
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,137
of 95,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.