Title |
Bisphosphonate therapy for children and adolescents with secondary osteoporosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005324.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leanne Ward, Andrea Tricco, Phuc-Nhi Phuong, Ann Cranney, Nick Barrowman, Isabelle Gaboury, Frank Rauch, Peter Tugwell, David Moher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 313 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 14% |
Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
Researcher | 29 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
Other | 77 | 24% |
Unknown | 70 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
Psychology | 13 | 4% |
Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 2% |
Other | 35 | 11% |
Unknown | 92 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,593,718
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,041
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,689
of 76,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.