| Title |
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000125.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerd Flodgren, Mary Ann O'Brien, Elena Parmelli, Jeremy M Grimshaw |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 565 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 13% |
| Researcher | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 123 | 21% |
| Unknown | 157 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 151 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 3% |
| Psychology | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 82 | 14% |
| Unknown | 180 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,653,238
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,781
of 12,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,227
of 352,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.