↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Indoor air modification interventions for prolonged non‐specific cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Indoor air modification interventions for prolonged non‐specific cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005075.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre Donnelly, Mark Everard, Anne B Chang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 35 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Unspecified 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 40 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,812
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.