| Title |
Indoor air modification interventions for prolonged non-specific cough in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005075.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deirdre Donnelly, Mark Everard, Anne B Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,041
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,011
of 66,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.