↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
Title
Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008618.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna C Gibbs, Norma J MacIntyre, Matteo Ponzano, Jeffrey Alan Templeton, Lehana Thabane, Alexandra Papaioannou, Lora M Giangregorio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 356 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Researcher 25 7%
Other 24 7%
Other 81 23%
Unknown 101 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 17%
Unspecified 25 7%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 116 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#768,888
of 21,397,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,715
of 12,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,016
of 283,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,397,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.