| Title |
Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008618.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenna C Gibbs, Norma J MacIntyre, Matteo Ponzano, Jeffrey Alan Templeton, Lehana Thabane, Alexandra Papaioannou, Lora M Giangregorio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 14% |
| Germany | 6 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Mozambique | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 74% |
| Scientists | 12 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 433 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 19% |
| Unknown | 153 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 171 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#930,595
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,998
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,459
of 348,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.