↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007648.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelson NG Silva, Aline Mizusaki Imoto, Gustavo JM Almeida, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria Stella Peccin, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 20%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 17%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,101
of 103,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.