↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Balance training (proprioceptive training) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007648.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelson NG Silva, Aline Mizusaki Imoto, Gustavo JM Almeida, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria Stella Peccin, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 19%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 32 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,896,335
of 15,582,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,652
of 11,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,036
of 263,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,582,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.