↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Xuebijing for paraquat poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Xuebijing for paraquat poisoning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010109.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Deng, Dongmei Huo, Qiaoyuan Wu, Lin Zhu, Yunhua Liao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Psychology 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,226,798
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,001
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,619
of 210,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#203
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.