| Title |
Exposure to the smell and taste of milk to accelerate feeding in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013038.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Muelbert, Luling Lin, Frank H Bloomfield, Jane E Harding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 27% |
| Ireland | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
| Scientists | 8 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,031,336
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,158
of 12,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,642
of 350,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.