| Title |
Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013379 |
| Authors |
Louise Rose, Anna‐Liisa Sutt, Andre Carlos Amaral, Dean A Fergusson, Nicholas Hart, Orla M Smith, Craig M Dale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,955,634
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,202
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,392
of 359,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.