↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013379
Authors

Louise Rose, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Andre Carlos Amaral, Dean A Fergusson, Nicholas Hart, Orla M Smith, Craig M Dale

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,245,170
of 17,375,479 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,225
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,062
of 267,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,375,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.