↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006348.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Adams, Taixiang Wu, Xunzhe Yang, Shusheng Tai, Sunita Vohra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Librarian 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,036,997
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,352
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,860
of 107,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.