↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for the treatment of idiopathic chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006348.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise Adams, Taixiang Wu, Xunzhe Yang, Shusheng Tai, Sunita Vohra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,786,256
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,137
of 11,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,329
of 268,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.