@Healthy_Control @KarlaWeiser Read the complaint and response. I'm confused - what is the current status of the review? Awaiting an update? I agree that the subjective outcomes are prone to considerable bias. This is one reason why we decided not to pool t
RT @DrAngelaLawson: Psychotherapy doesn't improve pregnancy chances. "There were substantial methodological weaknesses in the studies, all…
Stress doesn't cause infertility FYI. it's a medical condition for both men and women! A vacation, relaxing, stop trying, and just adopt are not what will take it away! Some people really need to understand infertility before they give out "advice"
RT @drjulieb: Gasp--does this mean that stress doesn't cause infertility, if therapy to reduce it doesn't increase chances? {OK, that was…
Hey guys!! Relaxing won't get you pregnant!! Who knew, hey? (Er, apparently not EVERYONE who likes to tell you it's a miracle infertility cure. So helpful ). Stress doesn't cause infertility, infertility causes stress. <repeat to fade>
Gasp--does this mean that stress doesn't cause infertility, if therapy to reduce it doesn't increase chances? {OK, that was me being snarky}
Psychotherapy doesn't improve pregnancy chances. "There were substantial methodological weaknesses in the studies, all of which were judged to be at high risk of bias for one or more quality assessment domains." https://t.co/WK982abO19
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
so true while it is often used as a critique of SRs.
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
RT @tlassers: One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX https://t.co/ORfYfxJlx6
One of the best reviews I’ve ever read illustrates this point perfectly https://t.co/4cp9wxtdXX
And this @CochraneLibrary review shows how: https://t.co/WBpj4YsFWW https://t.co/ecV9wKivAl
Fascinating: quality of evidence was so low, the authors couldn't answer the review question (2/2) https://t.co/rBWBm51iMU
Our systematic review on psychological interventions for subfertility: https://t.co/Q3hZN5K6PP
RT @menshealthleeds: Psychological & educational interventions for subfertile men & women: New @cochranecollab review https://t.co/1Dj8uLiw…
Psychological & educational interventions for subfertile men & women: New @cochranecollab review https://t.co/1Dj8uLiwMC #mentalhealth
RT @tlassers: 39 trials, no results: Evidence base for psychological Rx in subfertility lacks credibility https://t.co/PBvbJpE0Yg #Cochrane…
RT @tlassers: 39 trials, no results: Evidence base for psychological Rx in subfertility lacks credibility https://t.co/PBvbJpE0Yg #Cochrane…
RT @tlassers: 39 trials, no results: Evidence base for psychological Rx in subfertility lacks credibility https://t.co/PBvbJpE0Yg #Cochrane…
39 trials, no results: Evidence base for psychological Rx in subfertility lacks credibility https://t.co/PBvbJpE0Yg #CochraneEvidence