| Title |
Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002217.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Nevitt, Catrin Tudur Smith, Anthony G Marson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
| Russia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,529,987
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,729
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,786
of 359,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.