| Title |
Protein hydrolysate versus standard formula for preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012412.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek Hang Cheong Ng, Joel RL Klassen, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 85 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,075,686
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,484
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,367
of 346,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.