| Title |
Pharmacological agents for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004477.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon R Lewis, Michael W Pritchard, Carmel M Thomas, Andrew F Smith |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Japan | 4 | 13% |
| Germany | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 331 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 107 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 13% |
| Unknown | 119 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,381,551
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,133
of 12,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,669
of 348,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.