↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

Overview of attention for article published in this source, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008403.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

de Lijster, Manou S, Bergevoet, Rosemarijn M, van Dalen, Elvira C, Michiels, Erna MC, Caron, Huib N, Kremer, Leontien CM, Aronson, Daniel C

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology has been accepted as a technique in paediatric surgical oncology, but there is limited experience with the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,562,095
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from this source
#6,576
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,149
of 108,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#79
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.