↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Tyrosine supplementation for phenylketonuria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001507.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Webster, Joanne Wildgoose

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#9,953,727
of 15,625,110 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,564
of 11,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,601
of 262,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.