↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Home versus hospital intravenous antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001917.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balaguer, Albert, González de Dios, Javier

Abstract

Recurrent endobronchial infection in cystic fibrosis requires treatment with intravenous antibiotics for several weeks usually in hospital, affecting health costs and quality of life for patients and their families.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 12 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#413,336
of 6,508,999 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,901
of 8,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,097
of 83,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#21
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,508,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.