↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
86 tweeters
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
367 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
715 Mendeley
Title
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009234.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne Jones, Mohammad Othman, Therese Dowswell, Zarko Alfirevic, Simon Gates, Mary Newburn, Susan Jordan, Tina Lavender, James P Neilson

Abstract

The pain that women experience during labour is affected by multiple physiological and psychosocial factors and its intensity can vary greatly.  Most women in labour require pain relief. Pain management strategies include non-pharmacological interventions (that aim to help women cope with pain in labour) and pharmacological interventions (that aim to relieve the pain of labour).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 715 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Turkey 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 694 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 136 19%
Student > Bachelor 120 17%
Researcher 93 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Other 152 21%
Unknown 95 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 282 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 160 22%
Social Sciences 37 5%
Psychology 37 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 3%
Other 55 8%
Unknown 122 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#188,497
of 17,444,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#362
of 11,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#904
of 130,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,444,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.