↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001016.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Cindy Low, Iain T Cameron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 86 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 95 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,830,589
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,030
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,275
of 353,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.