↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000091.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zilong Hao, Ming Liu, Carl Counsell, Joanna M Wardlaw, Sen Lin, Xiaoling Zhao

Abstract

Fibrinogen depleting agents reduce fibrinogen in blood plasma, reduce blood viscosity and hence increase blood flow. This may help remove the blood clot blocking the artery and re-establish blood flow to the affected area of the brain after an ischaemic stroke. The risk of haemorrhage may be less than with thrombolytic agents. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1997 and last updated in 2003.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,245,662
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,070
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,610
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.