↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005011.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewurabena Simpson, Yulia Lin, Simon Stanworth, Janet Birchall, Carolyn Doree, Chris Hyde

Abstract

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is licensed for use in patients with haemophilia and inhibitory allo-antibodies and for prophylaxis and treatment of patients with congenital factor VII deficiency. It is also used for off-license indications to prevent bleeding in operations where blood loss is likely to be high, and/or to stop bleeding that is proving difficult to control by other means. This is the third version of the 2007 Cochrane review on the use of recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia, and has been updated to incorporate recent trial data.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 211 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Other 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 52 24%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,777,664
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,420
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,156
of 169,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.