↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Participation of traditional, complementary and alternative health practitioners in conventional health systems in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Participation of traditional, complementary and alternative health practitioners in conventional health systems in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013391
Authors

Renée Street, Torkel Falkenberg, Tobias Sundberg, Yusentha Balakrishna, Amber Abrams, Tamara Kredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Other 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,630
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,240
of 356,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.