↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
Title
Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002972.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Verena Walsh, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 491 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 13%
Student > Master 61 12%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Other 26 5%
Other 70 14%
Unknown 182 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 201 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,328,146
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,828
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,084
of 350,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.