↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008896.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myat E Arrowsmith, Catherine RH Aicken, Sonia Saxena, Azeem Majeed

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective and are the most widely used reversible contraceptive method in the world. However, in developed countries IUDs are among the least common methods of contraception used. We evaluated the effect of interventions to increase uptake of the copper IUD, a long-acting, reversible contraceptive method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 214 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 56 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,798
of 169,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.