↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011711.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivanizia S Silva, Rafaela Pedrosa, Ingrid G Azevedo, Anne-Marie Forbes, Guilherme AF Fregonezi, Mário ET Dourado Junior, Suzianne RH Lima, Gardenia MH Ferreira

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 19%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 78 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 23%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 87 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,511,725
of 16,164,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,900
of 11,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,086
of 266,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,164,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.