Title |
Bicycle helmet legislation for the uptake of helmet use and prevention of head injuries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005401.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alison Macpherson, Anneliese Spinks |
Abstract |
Evidence exists to suggest that bicycle helmets may reduce the risk of head injuries to cyclists, however helmets are not uniformly worn by all bicycle users. Legislation has been enacted in some countries to mandate helmet use by cyclists, however the issue remains controversial with opponents arguing that this may inhibit people from bicycle riding and thus from gaining the associated health benefits, or that other countermeasures may have been responsible for decline in head injuries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 27% |
Canada | 3 | 10% |
United States | 3 | 10% |
Sweden | 2 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Croatia | 1 | 3% |
Czechia | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 239 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 18% |
Researcher | 34 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Other | 51 | 20% |
Unknown | 58 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
Engineering | 13 | 5% |
Psychology | 13 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 75 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#878,028
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,700
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,759
of 96,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.