↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for patellar tendinopathy (jumper’s knee)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for patellar tendinopathy (jumper’s knee)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Dan, Alfred Phillips, Renea V Johnston, Ian A Harris

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Master 19 9%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 11 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 92 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Sports and Recreations 14 6%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 103 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,515,997
of 18,623,929 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,702
of 11,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,982
of 279,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.