↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003654.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Chen, Muke Zhou, Mi Yang, Jian Guo, Cairong Zhu, Jie Yang, Yucai Wang, Xue Yang, Li He

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a relatively new antihypertensive class. The effect of first-line CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,842
of 104,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.