| Title |
Abdominal ultrasound for diagnosing abdominal tuberculosis or disseminated tuberculosis with abdominal involvement in HIV-positive individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012777.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J Van Hoving, Rulan Griesel, Graeme Meintjes, Yemisi Takwoingi, Gary Maartens, Eleanor A Ochodo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 89 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895,708
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,154
of 13,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,891
of 354,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.