↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Elattar, Andrew Bryant, Brett A Winter-Roach, Mohamed Hatem, Raj Naik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Other 20 8%
Other 58 24%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 53 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,246,439
of 17,060,012 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,992
of 11,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,442
of 218,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,060,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.