↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004957.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Louisa Ng, Senen Gonzalez, Tom Hale, Lynne Turner‐Stokes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 395 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 17%
Researcher 50 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Other 29 7%
Other 85 21%
Unknown 85 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 13%
Psychology 18 4%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 107 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,077,903
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,164
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,508
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.