↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004957.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fary Khan, Louisa Ng, Senen Gonzalez, Tom Hale, Lynne Turner-Stokes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 323 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 21%
Researcher 48 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 8%
Other 74 22%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 14%
Psychology 17 5%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Sports and Recreations 13 4%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 67 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,644,929
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,981
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,621
of 271,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.