↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for idiopathic toe walking

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for idiopathic toe walking
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012363.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoni J Caserta, Verity Pacey, Michael C Fahey, Kelly Gray, Raoul HH Engelbert, Cylie M Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 303 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 15%
Student > Master 32 11%
Researcher 30 10%
Other 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 4%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 99 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 18%
Psychology 11 4%
Unspecified 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 117 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,573,486
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,597
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,088
of 350,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.