↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) for detecting metastases of Ewing sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) for detecting metastases of Ewing sarcoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012133
Authors

Lianne M Haveman, Willemijn B Breunis, Jérémie F Cohen, Elvira C van Dalen, Emilia C Owers, Uta Dirksen, Leontien CM Kremer, Heribert Jürgens, Henk van den Berg, Johannes HM Merks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 50%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,845,697
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,632
of 12,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,889
of 300,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#250
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.