↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled antibiotics for long‐term therapy in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Inhaled antibiotics for long‐term therapy in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001021.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Ryan, Meenu Singh, Kerry Dwan

Abstract

Inhaled antibiotics are commonly used to treat persistent airway infection that contributes to lung damage in people with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,876,302
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,533
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,467
of 119,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.