@YavorRM @BenjaminLukeFox Lets all be friends 🤫 https://t.co/bn4DUxxLPy
RT @Wiley_Health: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. New systematic review from @CochranePCG identif…
Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. New systematic review from @CochranePCG identified 18 trials including 1272 women but given design limitations there is insufficient evidence. https://t.co/fTnqUanAq0 https://t.co/72
RT @CochraneUK: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/hTvJPbg3e0 New systematic review fr…
RT @CochraneUK: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/hTvJPbg3e0 New systematic review fr…
RT @Cochrane_Child: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CMxStMzYYe New systematic review…
Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CMxStMzYYe New systematic review from @CochranePCG identified 18 trials including 1272 women but given design limitations there is insufficient evidence. https://t.co/s43
New review 'Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section' examines the relative benefits and risks of these two regional block methods for women undergoing caesarean and for their babies. https://t.co/45kmzCTEWn https://t.co/Bjn
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
RT @CochraneLibrary: Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review…
Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section https://t.co/CiwUdBuGuA New systematic review from @CochranePCG identified 18 trials including 1272 women but given design limitations there is insufficient evidence.
Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section : https://t.co/phK7qkLsmA