↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007429.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel JS Tamaoki, Mário Lenza, Fabio T Matsunaga, João Carlos Belloti, Marcelo H Matsumoto, Flávio Faloppa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Unspecified 18 7%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 88 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 12%
Unspecified 12 4%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 101 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#817,571
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,710
of 12,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,247
of 354,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.