↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Assisted standing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Assisted standing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011550.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katy Pedlow, Suzanne McDonough, Sheila Lennon, Claire Kerr, Ian Bradbury

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 57 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 17%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 66 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,810,931
of 22,440,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,283
of 12,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,721
of 297,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,440,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.