| Title |
Human resource management training of supervisors for improving health and well-being of employees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010905.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Kuehnl, Christian Seubert, Eva Rehfuess, Erik von Elm, Dennis Nowak, Jürgen Glaser |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 16% |
| Unknown | 101 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 14% |
| Psychology | 29 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 114 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,103,550
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,533
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,464
of 346,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.