| Title |
Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001924 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlo Gandolfo, Peter AG Sandercock, Massimo Conti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,598,062
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,045
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,382
of 124,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.