↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Route of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of cerebrospinal fluid‐shunt infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Route of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of cerebrospinal fluid‐shunt infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012902.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian HHMJ Arts, Hieronymus Damianus Boogaarts, Erik J van Lindert

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 54 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 65 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,712
of 366,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.