Title |
Piracetam for fetal distress in labour
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001064.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G Justus Hofmeyr, Regina Kulier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,931,181
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,262
of 12,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,372
of 168,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.