| Title |
Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005015.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suetonia C Palmer, Edmund YM Chung, David O McGregor, Friederike Bachmann, Giovanni FM Strippoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 351 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 113 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,745,264
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,410
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,057
of 372,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.