↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012888.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kee Thai Yeo, Juin Yee Kong, Arun Sasi, Kenneth Tan, Nai Ming Lai, Tim Schindler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 9 7%
Unspecified 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 65 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Unspecified 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 72 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,262,063
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,038
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,995
of 362,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.