↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion‐associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Stopping enteral feeds for prevention of transfusion‐associated necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012888.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kee Thai Yeo, Juin Yee Kong, Arun Sasi, Kenneth Tan, Nai Ming Lai, Tim Schindler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Master 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 93 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Unspecified 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 101 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,078,736
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,446
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,669
of 377,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.